Describe and evaluate one social psychological theory of aggression? Essay

De unmarriedisation is when some i loses their sense of identity and engages themselves in immoral things. The theory of deindividualisation suggests that when an individual is involved in a crowd they act like the crowd i.e. such as football hooligans. Just as the saying goes you are what you expose or eat can be employ here i.e. you are upon what your crowd or peers are upon.Le Bon proposed that there were a number of factors that turn over an individual to become psychologi chit-chaty transformed in a crowd. One being remaining nameless in the crowd i.e. when youre around a lot of people you are unlikely to be spotted. Zimbardo however argued with Le Bon saying that deindividualisation is a result of reduced responsibility, increased arousal, sensory overload and adapted consciousness.Research study into deindivialistion Zimbardo prison experimentAimTo investigate whether situational or dispositional factors are what make us aggressive.Procedure 24 emotionally stable men were recruited There were 2 groups one was guards and the other one was prisoners.Zimbardo changed the identity of prisoners by giving them numbers, and being referred to by numbers.Zimbardo also changed the identity of guards by making them wear military clothes. They carried whistles, handcuffs etcFindingsEven though the environment was artificial guards and prisoners still obeyed and reacted brutal.Situational alternatively than dispositional because they were normal caring men.AO2 valuation of Zimbardo et al studyHigh ecological validity due to the fact that the environment and the demeanor were certainistic. Even though the set up was artificial, the aggression or a loss of identity was rather bizarre even though all men knew its a fake set up. memorise showed high extremes of aggression and behaviour when identity is lost.NegativeUnethical because extreme harm either communicative or physical was afflicted.Sample was unrepresantable because it barely included men.AO1Resear ch into Deindiviualistion Diener et al trick or apportion experiment.Aimto investigate whether children steal, when in groups or individually. Procedure27 women were asked to give 1000 sweets to children during Halloween night slightly of the children were on their own while others were in groups.The women would open the door and pretend that a phone call came and instruct strictly for the children to only take one sweet eachA hidden perceiver saw whether they obeyed.Findingschildren were more likely to steal in a group when they are left anonymous.AO2 Evaluation of experimentPositiveHigh ecological validity because experiment was done in a real environment and a large sample was used.NegativeOnly children were used, would adults do the same?Study only showed stealing little minor stuff such as sweets, would it be same for instance in bank robbery?